SCOTUSblog on MSN
In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state.
Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to President Donald Trump’s executive overreach. Oral ...
10don MSNOpinion
The Solution to the Third-Term Threat
Republican leaders need to speak up now, loudly and clearly, against any schemes to put Donald Trump back into the White ...
The takeaway is that the tariffs may actually fall because of the conservative justices’ sincere commitment to their own ...
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has appointed Rachel Kamoutsas, wife of the state's education commissioner, as an appeals court ...
Justice Neil Gorsuch is well known for holding two firm convictions about legal theory: He is deeply concerned with the ...
Until now, the U.S. Supreme Court has been modestly deferential to Donald Trump's executive overreach. Oral arguments in the case challenging the legality of the president's tariffs suggest that this ...
There is a certain kind of critic for whom the obvious is much too monotonous.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Muldrow decision is a transformative shift in employment discrimination law under federal ...
The arguments against Trump’s tariff power are varied; and as it happens, each of the conservatives who might vote against him has a different theory of why his actions are problematic. Roberts’s pet ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback