Last Friday, a U.S. court ruled that a piece of art created by AI isn’t open to copyright protection, upholding earlier guidance issued by the U.S. Copyright Office ...

The D.C. district court recently affirmed the U.S. Copyright Office’s position that a work generated entirely by artificial intelligence (AI) technology is not ...

One of the hot-button issues that generative artificial intelligence (AI) has raised is whether works created by AI engines are copyrightable. In one of the first decisions on this issue, the D.C.

AI art is controversial for several reasons. One of those is the issue of copyright: both that of the work that was used to train the best AI art generators, in many cases without permission, and the ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at least initial human authorship is required for a copyright. Stream NBC 5 ...

A hot potato: One of the many hot-topic issues surrounding generative AI is whether artwork created by the technology can be copyrighted. Last week saw another judge rule that they cannot as "human ...

In the rapidly evolving intersection between technology and creativity, one fundamental misunderstanding is becoming dangerously widespread: the belief that a person can claim legal copyright ...

The U.S. Copyright Office has concluded that AI-generated work can be copyrighted when it embodies meaningful human authorship. This is big news. It means that those ...

The picture was created by Thaler's AI platform, the "Creativity Machine." The "Copyright Office's longstanding rule requiring a human author ... does not prohibit ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at least initial human authorship is ...